EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in TQ2 6 (Torbay)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector TQ2 6 (Torbay), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +1.0% (95% range −1.6% to +3.7%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 9% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,731 vs £2,500, 1,810 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+1.0%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −1.6% to +3.7%)
+9%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
1,810sales matched to a certificate
51%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 84 m² against 89 m² for D–G; both groups are most often built in 1950–1966; 36% of C+ and 52% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+9%—
Whole price, nothing held equal−0.2%−5.4% to +5.4%
Same floor area+8.0%+4.9% to +11.1%
+ same property type+9.3%+6.3% to +12.3%
+ same build period+5.2%+2.2% to +8.4%
+ same year of sale+1.0%−1.6% to +3.7%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in TQ2 6

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A3too few
B61£2,697
C455£2,731
D891£2,583
E310£2,360
F75£2,375
G15£2,175

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached100£3,346301£3,212
Semi-detached87£2,828367£2,594
Terraced153£2,500474£2,160
Flat / maisonette179£2,692149£2,342

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector TQ2 61,810+1.0%−1.6% to +3.7%
District TQ25,798+0.1%−1.5% to +1.8%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in TQ2 6 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)199 (4,013 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)9,073 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC2,854
Energy implied by their certificates (median)17,125 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 195 postcodes)51% (middle half 44%–60%)

Certificates by band imply: B 7,007 kWh (150 homes) · C 12,455 kWh (896 homes) · D 18,704 kWh (1,390 homes) · E 30,871 kWh (357 homes) · F 57,845 kWh (54 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

1,810 of 1,994 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (91%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats