EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in TQ12 1 (Teignbridge)?

A small premium for a better EPC here. In postcode sector TQ12 1 (Teignbridge), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — homes rated C or better sold for 2.4% more (95% range +0.2% to +4.7%). The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 17% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,881 vs £2,458, 3,039 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+2.4% ▲like-for-like: small premium (95% range +0.2% to +4.7%)
+17%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
3,039sales matched to a certificate
55%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 85 m² against 84 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1900–1929 for D–G; 63% of C+ and 48% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+17%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+15.7%+12.4% to +19.2%
Same floor area+15.4%+13.3% to +17.5%
+ same property type+11.4%+9.6% to +13.3%
+ same build period+6.5%+3.8% to +9.4%
+ same year of sale+2.4%+0.2% to +4.7%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in TQ12 1

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A3too few
B1,095£2,892
C551£2,812
D1,046£2,528
E265£2,238
F59£2,195
G20£1,836

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached495£2,877284£3,049
Semi-detached537£2,975377£2,597
Terraced438£2,785610£2,234
Flat / maisonette179£2,653119£2,135

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector TQ12 13,039+2.4%+0.2% to +4.7%
District TQ1211,366−1.0%−2.0% to −0.1%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in TQ12 1 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)244 (5,434 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)7,871 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC4,232
Energy implied by their certificates (median)12,250 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 241 postcodes)55% (middle half 46%–67%)

Certificates by band imply: B 6,435 kWh (1,142 homes) · C 10,636 kWh (1,227 homes) · D 17,172 kWh (1,490 homes) · E 29,246 kWh (305 homes) · F 39,356 kWh (56 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

3,039 of 3,222 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (94%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats