EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in TF2 9 (Telford and Wrekin)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector TF2 9 (Telford and Wrekin), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −1.0% (95% range −2.9% to +1.0%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 24% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,736 vs £2,203, 2,506 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−1.0%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −2.9% to +1.0%)
+24%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
2,506sales matched to a certificate
61%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 95 m² against 89 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1983–1990 for D–G; 81% of C+ and 77% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+24%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+23.7%+19.3% to +28.2%
Same floor area+18.4%+15.8% to +21.0%
+ same property type+19.3%+16.9% to +21.6%
+ same build period+4.6%+1.8% to +7.4%
+ same year of sale−1.0%−2.9% to +1.0%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in TF2 9

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A12£3,009
B942£2,864
C584£2,311
D804£2,264
E142£1,920
F17£1,789
G5too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached819£2,863494£2,435
Semi-detached422£2,682251£2,093
Terraced259£2,375209£1,863
Flat / maisonette38£1,75814£1,753

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector TF2 92,506−1.0%−2.9% to +1.0%
District TF26,355−3.0%−4.4% to −1.6%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in TF2 9 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)291 (6,016 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)9,883 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC4,929
Energy implied by their certificates (median)11,444 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 275 postcodes)61% (middle half 54%–79%)

Certificates by band imply: A 4,326 kWh (220 homes) · B 6,920 kWh (1,689 homes) · C 12,256 kWh (1,450 homes) · D 20,945 kWh (1,340 homes) · E 32,382 kWh (208 homes) · F 42,681 kWh (17 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

2,506 of 2,591 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (97%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats