EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in GL53 0 (Cheltenham)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector GL53 0 (Cheltenham), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −2.7% (95% range −5.8% to +0.5%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 4% less per square metre than D–G homes (median £4,250 vs £4,435, 1,258 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−2.7%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −5.8% to +0.5%)
−4%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
1,258sales matched to a certificate
53%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 108 m² against 105 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and before 1900 for D–G; 75% of C+ and 77% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)−4%—
Whole price, nothing held equal−4.0%−9.3% to +1.6%
Same floor area−4.8%−7.7% to −1.9%
+ same property type−3.2%−5.9% to −0.5%
+ same build period+2.4%−1.5% to +6.5%
+ same year of sale−2.7%−5.8% to +0.5%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in GL53 0

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A13£5,882
B408£4,154
C235£4,613
D418£4,541
E152£4,294
F27£4,451
G5too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached342£4,275221£4,803
Semi-detached150£4,671242£4,327
Terraced91£4,154109£4,290
Flat / maisonette73£3,16730£3,259

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector GL53 01,258−2.7%−5.8% to +0.5%
District GL534,254−2.1%−3.6% to −0.5%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in GL53 0 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)140 (2,221 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)12,578 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,674
Energy implied by their certificates (median)19,733 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 134 postcodes)53% (middle half 46%–61%)

Certificates by band imply: B 8,065 kWh (498 homes) · C 18,030 kWh (335 homes) · D 24,637 kWh (614 homes) · E 38,021 kWh (186 homes) · F 66,537 kWh (35 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

1,258 of 1,354 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (93%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats