EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in WR5 2 (Worcester)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector WR5 2 (Worcester), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +0.1% (95% range −2.3% to +2.6%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 14% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £3,089 vs £2,710, 2,156 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+0.1%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −2.3% to +2.6%)
+14%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
2,156sales matched to a certificate
59%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 93 m² against 94 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1900–1929 for D–G; 77% of C+ and 67% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+14%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+12.7%+8.9% to +16.7%
Same floor area+12.9%+10.6% to +15.2%
+ same property type+9.3%+7.2% to +11.5%
+ same build period+5.2%+2.1% to +8.4%
+ same year of sale+0.1%−2.3% to +2.6%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in WR5 2

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A96£3,557
B564£3,069
C374£2,914
D718£2,824
E305£2,548
F78£2,457
G21£2,185

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached496£3,077356£3,016
Semi-detached304£3,244392£2,715
Terraced135£2,918276£2,565
Flat / maisonette99£2,76698£2,147

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector WR5 22,156+0.1%−2.3% to +2.6%
District WR56,786+1.6%+0.3% to +2.8%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in WR5 2 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)160 (3,619 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)10,132 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC2,727
Energy implied by their certificates (median)15,388 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 156 postcodes)59% (middle half 51%–74%)

Certificates by band imply: A 3,519 kWh (114 homes) · B 6,319 kWh (705 homes) · C 13,555 kWh (670 homes) · D 21,364 kWh (920 homes) · E 32,788 kWh (277 homes) · F 48,610 kWh (39 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

2,156 of 2,318 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (93%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats