EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in TS5 4 (Middlesbrough)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector TS5 4 (Middlesbrough), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is 0.0% (95% range −5.3% to +5.6%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 65% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £1,750 vs £1,062, 770 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

0.0%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −5.3% to +5.6%)
+65%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
770sales matched to a certificate
64%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 74 m² against 82 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1930–1949 for D–G; 76% of C+ and 27% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+65%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+40.0%+34.3% to +45.9%
Same floor area+47.7%+41.6% to +54.0%
+ same property type+24.9%+19.4% to +30.6%
+ same build period+4.2%−2.4% to +11.2%
+ same year of sale0.0%−5.3% to +5.6%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in TS5 4

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A1too few
B259£1,908
C129£1,271
D289£1,096
E81£1,013
F7too few
G4too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached100£1,8512—
Semi-detached194£1,817100£1,201
Terraced88£1,280279£1,013
Flat / maisonette7—0—

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector TS5 47700.0%−5.3% to +5.6%
District TS56,822+3.1%+1.3% to +4.9%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in TS5 4 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)136 (2,620 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)10,093 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC2,148
Energy implied by their certificates (median)14,405 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 134 postcodes)64% (middle half 54%–78%)

Certificates by band imply: B 6,389 kWh (398 homes) · C 12,113 kWh (766 homes) · D 18,401 kWh (785 homes) · E 28,094 kWh (180 homes) · F 36,964 kWh (15 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

770 of 838 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (92%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats