EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in TS17 6 (Stockton-on-Tees)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector TS17 6 (Stockton-on-Tees), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +4.4% (95% range −2.6% to +11.9%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 61% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £1,149 vs £713, 395 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+4.4%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −2.6% to +11.9%)
+61%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
395sales matched to a certificate
58%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 68 m² against 88 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2007–2011 for C+ and 1900–1929 for D–G; 21% of C+ and 7% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+61%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+32.2%+24.4% to +40.6%
Same floor area+39.9%+31.1% to +49.2%
+ same property type+34.5%+25.1% to +44.6%
+ same build period+7.9%−0.2% to +16.7%
+ same year of sale+4.4%−2.6% to +11.9%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in TS17 6

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A1too few
B34£1,149
C180£1,152
D134£732
E37£694
F6too few
G3too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached3—0—
Semi-detached43£1,69012£845
Terraced92£1,081157£688
Flat / maisonette77£1,10811£1,145

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector TS17 6395+4.4%−2.6% to +11.9%
District TS177,689+1.1%−0.3% to +2.5%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in TS17 6 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)71 (1,543 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)8,624 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,446
Energy implied by their certificates (median)13,690 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 65 postcodes)58% (middle half 48%–67%)

Certificates by band imply: B 6,379 kWh (127 homes) · C 10,641 kWh (715 homes) · D 20,120 kWh (486 homes) · E 31,494 kWh (109 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

395 of 534 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (74%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats