EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in TF5 0 (Telford and Wrekin)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector TF5 0 (Telford and Wrekin), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −2.3% (95% range −4.8% to +0.3%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 2% less per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,308 vs £2,362, 768 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−2.3%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −4.8% to +0.3%)
−2%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
768sales matched to a certificate
56%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 116 m² against 97 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 1996–2002 for C+ and 1983–1990 for D–G; 78% of C+ and 81% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)−2%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+20.6%+12.1% to +29.8%
Same floor area+2.3%−1.9% to +6.7%
+ same property type+5.5%+1.3% to +9.8%
+ same build period+2.3%−1.6% to +6.4%
+ same year of sale−2.3%−4.8% to +0.3%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in TF5 0

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
B44£3,061
C235£2,222
D445£2,352
E42£2,476
F2too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached170£2,598270£2,410
Semi-detached48£2,129128£2,355
Terraced54£2,06488£2,251
Flat / maisonette7—3—

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector TF5 0768−2.3%−4.8% to +0.3%
District TF5768−2.3%−4.8% to +0.3%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in TF5 0 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)101 (1,927 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)11,747 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,253
Energy implied by their certificates (median)18,924 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 99 postcodes)56% (middle half 51%–62%)

Certificates by band imply: B 12,563 kWh (67 homes) · C 15,742 kWh (470 homes) · D 21,238 kWh (652 homes) · E 27,879 kWh (60 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

768 of 808 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (95%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats