EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in PE36 5 (King's Lynn and West Norfolk)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector PE36 5 (King's Lynn and West Norfolk), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −2.6% (95% range −5.9% to +0.8%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 5% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £3,013 vs £2,878, 1,138 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−2.6%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −5.9% to +0.8%)
+5%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
1,138sales matched to a certificate
53%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 77 m² against 81 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and before 1900 for D–G; 53% of C+ and 68% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+5%—
Whole price, nothing held equal−0.1%−5.4% to +5.6%
Same floor area+4.9%+1.2% to +8.7%
+ same property type+12.2%+8.9% to +15.7%
+ same build period−1.9%−5.6% to +2.0%
+ same year of sale−2.6%−5.9% to +0.8%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in PE36 5

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A1too few
B220£3,137
C264£2,734
D416£3,000
E179£2,639
F48£2,365
G10£2,850

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached157£3,190276£3,313
Semi-detached98£3,193167£2,688
Terraced63£2,857119£2,544
Flat / maisonette167£2,54191£2,288

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector PE36 51,138−2.6%−5.9% to +0.8%
District PE361,887−2.3%−5.5% to +1.1%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in PE36 5 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)85 (1,619 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)8,138 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,353
Energy implied by their certificates (median)14,533 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 80 postcodes)53% (middle half 45%–68%)

Certificates by band imply: B 6,831 kWh (223 homes) · C 12,137 kWh (466 homes) · D 17,926 kWh (513 homes) · E 34,012 kWh (134 homes) · F 49,779 kWh (10 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

1,138 of 1,328 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (86%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats