EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in OX17 1 (Cherwell)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector OX17 1 (Cherwell), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −5.4% (95% range −11.8% to +1.4%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is different: C+ homes sold for 2% less per square metre than D–G homes (median £3,405 vs £3,471, 636 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−5.4%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −11.8% to +1.4%)
−2%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
636sales matched to a certificate
59%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 127 m² against 110 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and before 1900 for D–G; 85% of C+ and 82% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)−2%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+8.3%−0.1% to +17.4%
Same floor area−0.8%−5.5% to +4.1%
+ same property type−1.0%−5.5% to +3.7%
+ same build period−2.7%−9.5% to +4.6%
+ same year of sale−5.4%−11.8% to +1.4%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in OX17 1

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A4too few
B48£3,442
C46£3,277
D196£3,438
E203£3,607
F112£3,389
G27£3,436

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached58£3,415280£3,642
Semi-detached25£3,438160£3,296
Terraced14£3,37795£3,431
Flat / maisonette1—3—

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector OX17 1636−5.4%−11.8% to +1.4%
District OX172,802−2.8%−4.8% to −0.8%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in OX17 1 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)18 (253 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)11,934 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC207
Energy implied by their certificates (median)19,542 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 17 postcodes)59% (middle half 50%–66%)

Certificates by band imply: B 7,827 kWh (18 homes) · C 15,123 kWh (68 homes) · D 23,772 kWh (90 homes) · E 35,639 kWh (28 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

636 of 748 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (85%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats