EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in OX16 4 (Cherwell)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector OX16 4 (Cherwell), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −1.7% (95% range −3.8% to +0.5%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 4% less per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,943 vs £3,077, 612 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−1.7%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −3.8% to +0.5%)
−4%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
612sales matched to a certificate
66%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 61 m² against 66 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2003–2006 for C+ and 1983–1990 for D–G; 24% of C+ and 45% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)−4%—
Whole price, nothing held equal−12.4%−17.0% to −7.6%
Same floor area−7.3%−11.0% to −3.4%
+ same property type+3.1%+0.5% to +5.9%
+ same build period+0.3%−2.2% to +2.9%
+ same year of sale−1.7%−3.8% to +0.5%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in OX16 4

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A1too few
B43£2,935
C304£2,948
D223£3,069
E38£3,404
F2too few
G1too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached37£3,41344£3,310
Semi-detached47£4,05474£3,501
Terraced70£3,21579£3,286
Flat / maisonette194£2,73667£2,621

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector OX16 4612−1.7%−3.8% to +0.5%
District OX169,115−1.8%−2.6% to −1.0%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in OX16 4 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)49 (1,194 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)8,966 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC983
Energy implied by their certificates (median)12,460 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 48 postcodes)66% (middle half 58%–76%)

Certificates by band imply: B 5,761 kWh (61 homes) · C 11,166 kWh (582 homes) · D 17,060 kWh (305 homes) · E 28,298 kWh (32 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

612 of 683 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (90%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats