Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in NR29 5 (North Norfolk)?
No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector NR29 5 (North Norfolk), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +1.7% (95% range −5.2% to +9.1%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 3% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,806 vs £2,724, 838 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.
From the raw gap to like-for-like
The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 102 m² against 90 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1967–1975 for D–G; 81% of C+ and 88% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.
| Comparing C+ with D–G homes… | Difference | 95% range |
|---|---|---|
| Raw gap per m² (medians) | +3% | — |
| Whole price, nothing held equal | +20.7% | +10.5% to +31.9% |
| Same floor area | +8.2% | +2.2% to +14.6% |
| + same property type | +8.7% | +2.9% to +14.9% |
| + same build period | +2.6% | −5.9% to +11.9% |
| + same year of sale | +1.7% | −5.2% to +9.1% |
The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.
Sold prices by EPC band in NR29 5
| EPC band (last certificate before sale) | Sales | Median £ per m² |
|---|---|---|
| A | 2 | too few |
| B | 32 | £3,515 |
| C | 62 | £2,578 |
| D | 342 | £2,682 |
| E | 253 | £2,769 |
| F | 119 | £2,764 |
| G | 28 | £2,751 |
A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.
C or better vs D–G, by property type
| Type | C+ sales | C+ £/m² | D–G sales | D–G £/m² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detached | 64 | £3,173 | 469 | £2,892 |
| Semi-detached | 14 | £2,596 | 187 | £2,500 |
| Terraced | 18 | £2,668 | 84 | £2,383 |
| Flat / maisonette | 0 | — | 2 | — |
Compared with the wider area
| Area | Sales | Like-for-like | 95% range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sector NR29 5 | 838 | +1.7% | −5.2% to +9.1% |
| District NR29 | 4,053 | +0.5% | −1.9% to +3.0% |
| England and Wales | 1,000,000 (sample) | +1.2% | +0.9% to +1.5% |
838 of 998 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (84%) were matched to a certificate.
How this is calculated
- Every standard sale (HM Land Registry Price Paid, category A) since January 2015 is matched to the latest energy certificate of the same address (postcode + house number or name + flat) lodged from 10 years before to 3 months after the sale; sales with no certificate or an ambiguous match are left out. Across England and Wales 92% of sales match.
- Price per m² uses the certificate's total floor area (15–1,000 m²).
- Like-for-like premium: regression of the log of price on “C or better”, log floor area, property type, the certificate's build period and the year of sale. The 95% range shows how precise the estimate is; when it includes zero, the data cannot tell the premium apart from none.
Caveats
- The band is the one on the certificate before the sale; certificates are a median 0.8 years old at the sale, but a quarter are over 4 years old and some homes were improved since.
- Condition, garden, parking, views and the exact position within the sector are not known; a premium could hide in them, or they could hide one.
- Individual sales and addresses are not shown.