EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in NE31 1 (South Tyneside)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector NE31 1 (South Tyneside), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +1.6% (95% range −1.5% to +4.8%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 37% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £1,913 vs £1,394, 1,896 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+1.6%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −1.5% to +4.8%)
+37%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
1,896sales matched to a certificate
67%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 85 m² against 81 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1900–1929 for D–G; 54% of C+ and 44% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+37%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+38.6%+32.3% to +45.2%
Same floor area+32.4%+27.3% to +37.7%
+ same property type+27.7%+24.1% to +31.4%
+ same build period+5.0%+1.3% to +8.9%
+ same year of sale+1.6%−1.5% to +4.8%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in NE31 1

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A5too few
B504£2,280
C830£1,740
D455£1,491
E90£1,115
F12£833

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached388£2,32986£2,224
Semi-detached339£2,067161£1,643
Terraced402£1,725228£1,139
Flat / maisonette210£1,40582£1,106

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector NE31 11,896+1.6%−1.5% to +4.8%
District NE313,847+0.1%−2.1% to +2.4%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in NE31 1 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)198 (5,065 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)9,655 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC3,896
Energy implied by their certificates (median)12,849 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 191 postcodes)67% (middle half 56%–77%)

Certificates by band imply: A 4,312 kWh (34 homes) · B 7,009 kWh (654 homes) · C 11,819 kWh (1,791 homes) · D 17,445 kWh (1,202 homes) · E 27,734 kWh (200 homes) · F 44,442 kWh (15 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

1,896 of 2,007 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (94%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats