EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in HU16 4 (East Riding of Yorkshire)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector HU16 4 (East Riding of Yorkshire), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is −0.4% (95% range −4.2% to +3.6%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 8% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,265 vs £2,090, 1,441 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

−0.4%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −4.2% to +3.6%)
+8%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
1,441sales matched to a certificate
55%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 89 m² against 93 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1930–1949 for D–G; 57% of C+ and 68% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+8%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+3.7%−1.6% to +9.3%
Same floor area+6.0%+2.9% to +9.3%
+ same property type+8.9%+6.0% to +11.8%
+ same build period+3.5%−0.8% to +8.0%
+ same year of sale−0.4%−4.2% to +3.6%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in HU16 4

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
A3too few
B142£2,407
C295£2,166
D715£2,129
E236£2,000
F44£1,846
G6too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached121£2,443193£2,345
Semi-detached129£2,224492£2,165
Terraced81£2,273254£1,887
Flat / maisonette109£1,97862£1,711

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector HU16 41,441−0.4%−4.2% to +3.6%
District HU163,637−3.0%−5.1% to −0.8%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in HU16 4 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)141 (2,919 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)12,428 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,919
Energy implied by their certificates (median)19,981 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 137 postcodes)55% (middle half 48%–64%)

Certificates by band imply: B 9,136 kWh (140 homes) · C 12,577 kWh (517 homes) · D 21,751 kWh (922 homes) · E 32,650 kWh (284 homes) · F 54,749 kWh (50 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

1,441 of 1,497 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (96%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats