EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in CH65 4 (Cheshire West and Chester)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector CH65 4 (Cheshire West and Chester), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +0.8% (95% range −5.1% to +7.2%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 48% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £2,023 vs £1,362, 409 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+0.8%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −5.1% to +7.2%)
+48%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
409sales matched to a certificate
74%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 81 m² against 73 m² for D–G; the most common build period is 2012 onwards for C+ and 1900–1929 for D–G; 67% of C+ and 15% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+48%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+64.8%+55.1% to +75.1%
Same floor area+47.9%+38.5% to +58.0%
+ same property type+31.0%+21.6% to +41.1%
+ same build period+1.3%−5.7% to +8.8%
+ same year of sale+0.8%−5.1% to +7.2%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in CH65 4

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
B240£2,071
C59£1,696
D89£1,419
E16£1,154
F4too few
G1too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached72£2,0780—
Semi-detached127£2,09916£1,311
Terraced51£1,90862£1,208
Flat / maisonette49£1,73732£1,845

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector CH65 4409+0.8%−5.1% to +7.2%
District CH654,065−2.1%−3.8% to −0.4%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in CH65 4 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)48 (1,099 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)5,763 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,028
Energy implied by their certificates (median)6,380 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 45 postcodes)74% (middle half 54%–90%)

Certificates by band imply: B 5,963 kWh (714 homes) · C 9,393 kWh (160 homes) · D 17,143 kWh (126 homes) · E 27,441 kWh (23 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

409 of 432 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (95%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats