EPC Price Check

Does a C-or-better EPC sell for more in CF39 0 (Rhondda Cynon Taf)?

No measurable EPC premium here. In postcode sector CF39 0 (Rhondda Cynon Taf), comparing like with like — same floor area, property type, build period and year of sale — the difference is +6.0% (95% range −0.6% to +13.1%): the EPC band itself is not reflected in sale prices here. The raw gap is bigger: C+ homes sold for 23% more per square metre than D–G homes (median £1,382 vs £1,126, 720 sales 2015–2026), mostly because they are different homes. Across England and Wales the like-for-like figure is +1.2%. Data: HM Land Registry Price Paid to 30 September 2026 matched to the EPC register.

Data: sales January 2015 – September 2026, EPC register November 2026, gas 2024 · calculated 5 November 2026 · Methodology and sources

+6.0%like-for-like: no measurable difference (95% range −0.6% to +13.1%)
+23%raw gap per m² (before like-for-like)
720sales matched to a certificate
53%metered gas, % of certificate estimate (rough)

From the raw gap to like-for-like

The homes are not alike: C+ homes here have a median floor area of 94 m² against 85 m² for D–G; both groups are most often built before 1900; 30% of C+ and 18% of D–G sales are detached or semi-detached houses.

Comparing C+ with D–G homes…Difference95% range
Raw gap per m² (medians)+23%—
Whole price, nothing held equal+37.3%+23.2% to +52.9%
Same floor area+25.7%+15.0% to +37.4%
+ same property type+18.5%+9.6% to +28.2%
+ same build period+16.1%+7.4% to +25.5%
+ same year of sale+6.0%−0.6% to +13.1%

The first row compares median prices per m²; the second compares whole prices; each later row adds one more thing that must be equal, ending with the like-for-like premium (regression of log price; build period from the certificate, 12 bands). The raw gap per m² and the whole-price gap differ because C+ and D–G homes differ in size.

Sold prices by EPC band in CF39 0

EPC band (last certificate before sale)SalesMedian £ per m²
B3too few
C111£1,385
D393£1,186
E182£1,045
F25£815
G6too few

A median is shown when a band has at least 10 sales.

C or better vs D–G, by property type

TypeC+ salesC+ £/m²D–G salesD–G £/m²
Detached25£1,91424£1,506
Semi-detached9—85£1,368
Terraced80£1,263494£1,081
Flat / maisonette0—3—

Compared with the wider area

AreaSalesLike-for-like95% range
Sector CF39 0720+6.0%−0.6% to +13.1%
District CF393,958+3.6%+1.1% to +6.2%
England and Wales1,000,000 (sample)+1.2%+0.9% to +1.5%

Average gas use in CF39 0 (2024): meters vs certificates

A rough comparison: the certificate figure is an upper-bound estimate (primary energy including lighting, converted with one factor), so treat the share as an order of magnitude.

Postcodes with published gas data (5+ meters)91 (2,318 meters)
Median gas use per meter (median of postcodes)10,582 kWh
Gas-heated homes with an EPC1,457
Energy implied by their certificates (median)19,143 kWh
Metered gas as a share of the certificate figure (median of 88 postcodes)53% (middle half 47%–61%)

Certificates by band imply: B 9,112 kWh (11 homes) · C 12,882 kWh (368 homes) · D 19,216 kWh (751 homes) · E 28,527 kWh (280 homes) · F 42,032 kWh (40 homes). Across England and Wales, real use is much closer to the certificate for A–C homes than for D–G homes, so the saving an upgrade promises is usually smaller than the certificate suggests.

Certificate energy = primary energy per m² × floor area ÷ 1.13, for homes whose latest certificate shows mains gas heating; it also covers lighting and other uses, so it is an upper bound for gas. DESNZ gas is weather-corrected and covers all meters in the postcode, with or without a certificate.

720 of 770 house and flat sales in the sector since 2015 (94%) were matched to a certificate.

How this is calculated

Caveats